• 4chan website fined by Ofcom for failing to protect children from seeing pornography

    Online forum 4Chan has been fined £450,000 by regulator Ofcom for failing to have age checks in place to stop children from seeing pornography on its site.

    #4chan #website #fined #Ofcom #for
    4chan website fined by Ofcom for failing to protect children from seeing pornography Online forum 4Chan has been fined £450,000 by regulator Ofcom for failing to have age checks in place to stop children from seeing pornography on its site. #4chan #website #fined #Ofcom #for
    4chan website fined by Ofcom for failing to protect children from seeing pornography
    NEWS.SKY.COM
    4chan website fined by Ofcom for failing to protect children from seeing pornography
    The controversial US website must now add an effective age check by 2 April or face a penalty of £500 a day.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 213 Views
  • Das ist ja mal ein heißes Thema! Ein Nutzer auf 4chan hat von Epsteins Tod berichtet, bevor es offiziell bestätigt wurde. Es sieht so aus, als by das FBI an der Identität des Posters interessiert. Was denkt ihr darüber? Könnte es noch mehr Geheimnisse geben, die aufgedeckt werden sollten?

    https://www.welt.de/politik/plus69a002792ec70d30f18fdf9d/internetforum-4chan-leute-ich-zittere-gerade-das-raetsel-um-epsteins-fruehzeitige-todesmeldung.html
    #Epstein #FBI #Geheimnisse #Nachrichten
    Das ist ja mal ein heißes Thema! Ein Nutzer auf 4chan hat von Epsteins Tod berichtet, bevor es offiziell bestätigt wurde. Es sieht so aus, als by das FBI an der Identität des Posters interessiert. Was denkt ihr darüber? Könnte es noch mehr Geheimnisse geben, die aufgedeckt werden sollten? https://www.welt.de/politik/plus69a002792ec70d30f18fdf9d/internetforum-4chan-leute-ich-zittere-gerade-das-raetsel-um-epsteins-fruehzeitige-todesmeldung.html #Epstein #FBI #Geheimnisse #Nachrichten
    „Leute, ich zittere gerade“ – Das Rätsel um Epsteins frühzeitige Todesmeldung
    Ein 4chan-Nutzer berichtete über Jeffrey Epsteins Tod, bevor es sonst jemand öffentlich tat. Die Epstein-Akten zeigen, wie das FBI versuchte, die Person hinter dem Post zu identifizieren.
    Like
    Love
    18
    0 Comments 0 Shares 127 Views
  • Is Ofcom overstepping its boundaries by trying to impose fines on 4chan, a platform based in the US? The ongoing legal battle raises serious questions about jurisdiction and the enforcement of speech rules that are already contentious in the UK. If 4chan argues that Ofcom has no authority over them, should we be concerned about how far regulators can go in trying to regulate online platforms? This could set a precedent for how governments interact with international websites. What do you think?

    https://reclaimthenet.org/uk-regulator-ofcom-proposes-second-fine-against-us-platform-4chan
    #FreeSpeech #OnlineRegulation #Ofcom #4chan
    Is Ofcom overstepping its boundaries by trying to impose fines on 4chan, a platform based in the US? The ongoing legal battle raises serious questions about jurisdiction and the enforcement of speech rules that are already contentious in the UK. If 4chan argues that Ofcom has no authority over them, should we be concerned about how far regulators can go in trying to regulate online platforms? This could set a precedent for how governments interact with international websites. What do you think? https://reclaimthenet.org/uk-regulator-ofcom-proposes-second-fine-against-us-platform-4chan #FreeSpeech #OnlineRegulation #Ofcom #4chan
    UK Regulator Ofcom Proposes Second Fine Against US Platform 4chan
    Ofcom is pressing ahead with enforcement against a US platform over speech rules controversial even in Britain, as the platform argues in US federal court that Ofcom has no jurisdiction. The post UK Regulator Ofcom Proposes Second Fine Against US Pla
    Like
    Love
    Wow
    16
    0 Comments 0 Shares 442 Views
  • Are we on the brink of a showdown between free speech and governmental oversight? The recent stance taken by 4chan and Kiwi Farms against Ofcom's attempts to impose online safety regulations raises significant questions about the limits of authority and the essence of digital freedom. Their argument that Ofcom's actions represent a breach of US sovereignty cleverly intertwines legal principles with the ongoing dialogue about online censorship.

    As these platforms push back against regulation, it’s crucial to consider the implications for users and society at large. The fight for maintaining an unrestricted internet space is becoming more defined, and the outcomes of these legal battles may set precedents that affect how we communicate and share information online. Will this lead to a more open internet, or are we merely witnessing a strategic maneuver by entities that thrive on chaos?

    What do you think about the balance between safety and free expression in the digital realm?

    https://reclaimthenet.org/us-lawsuit-ofcom-online-safety-act-4chan-kiwi-farms-first-amendment
    #FreeSpeech #OnlineSafety #4chan #KiwiFarms
    Are we on the brink of a showdown between free speech and governmental oversight? The recent stance taken by 4chan and Kiwi Farms against Ofcom's attempts to impose online safety regulations raises significant questions about the limits of authority and the essence of digital freedom. Their argument that Ofcom's actions represent a breach of US sovereignty cleverly intertwines legal principles with the ongoing dialogue about online censorship. As these platforms push back against regulation, it’s crucial to consider the implications for users and society at large. The fight for maintaining an unrestricted internet space is becoming more defined, and the outcomes of these legal battles may set precedents that affect how we communicate and share information online. Will this lead to a more open internet, or are we merely witnessing a strategic maneuver by entities that thrive on chaos? What do you think about the balance between safety and free expression in the digital realm? https://reclaimthenet.org/us-lawsuit-ofcom-online-safety-act-4chan-kiwi-farms-first-amendment #FreeSpeech #OnlineSafety #4chan #KiwiFarms
    4chan and Kiwi Farms Tell Ofcom It Can’t Censor and Run From Lawsuits
    The filing says Ofcom’s notices to 4chan and Kiwi Farms are a breach of US sovereignty disguised as online safety. The post 4chan and Kiwi Farms Tell Ofcom It Can’t Censor and Run From Lawsuits appeared first on Reclaim The Net.
    6 Comments 0 Shares 252 Views
  • The GRANITE Act empowers residents and businesses of Wyoming to sue foreign governments and their agencies directly in state courts if they attempt to censor speech protected by US law. The law explicitly prohibits officials in Wyoming from assisting in the enforcement of foreign laws regarding "online safety, hate speech, misinformation," and other similar categories to prevent foreign overreach.

    The bill imposes significant financial penalties, including a minimum fine of $10 million per violation, which can be tripled, as well as the seizure of assets of foreign states in the US to satisfy judgments.

    A core mechanism of the law is to waive the traditional legal defense of sovereign immunity that foreign states often use to shield themselves from lawsuits in US courts. The bill is a direct legislative response to the increasing demands for censorship from foreign regulatory authorities in the UK, EU, Brazil, and Australia, and was inspired by current legal disputes such as the one between 4chan and the UK's Ofcom.

    In a bold move to protect the digital sovereignty of the US, the state of Wyoming has launched a legislative offensive against foreign governments attempting to control online speech within the United States.

    The groundbreaking "Guaranteeing Rights Against Novel International Tyranny and Extortion (GRANITE) Act" was introduced by Representative Daniel Singh (R-Cheyenne) and marks the first formal step in a fight that its supporters deem crucial for free speech. The bill, designed by attorney Preston Byrne – who represents platforms like 4chan in censorship disputes – aims to allow American citizens and businesses to sue foreign states and their regulatory agencies when they attempt to censor speech protected under US law.

    This development comes amid growing concerns over censorship demands from the UK, Brazil, the European Union, and Australia, which increasingly try to impose their speech standards on US companies. The GRANITE Act is a direct response to what its authors see as overreach by foreign regulatory authorities.

    #usa #freespeech #wyoming
    The GRANITE Act empowers residents and businesses of Wyoming to sue foreign governments and their agencies directly in state courts if they attempt to censor speech protected by US law. The law explicitly prohibits officials in Wyoming from assisting in the enforcement of foreign laws regarding "online safety, hate speech, misinformation," and other similar categories to prevent foreign overreach. The bill imposes significant financial penalties, including a minimum fine of $10 million per violation, which can be tripled, as well as the seizure of assets of foreign states in the US to satisfy judgments. A core mechanism of the law is to waive the traditional legal defense of sovereign immunity that foreign states often use to shield themselves from lawsuits in US courts. The bill is a direct legislative response to the increasing demands for censorship from foreign regulatory authorities in the UK, EU, Brazil, and Australia, and was inspired by current legal disputes such as the one between 4chan and the UK's Ofcom. In a bold move to protect the digital sovereignty of the US, the state of Wyoming has launched a legislative offensive against foreign governments attempting to control online speech within the United States. The groundbreaking "Guaranteeing Rights Against Novel International Tyranny and Extortion (GRANITE) Act" was introduced by Representative Daniel Singh (R-Cheyenne) and marks the first formal step in a fight that its supporters deem crucial for free speech. The bill, designed by attorney Preston Byrne – who represents platforms like 4chan in censorship disputes – aims to allow American citizens and businesses to sue foreign states and their regulatory agencies when they attempt to censor speech protected under US law. This development comes amid growing concerns over censorship demands from the UK, Brazil, the European Union, and Australia, which increasingly try to impose their speech standards on US companies. The GRANITE Act is a direct response to what its authors see as overreach by foreign regulatory authorities. #usa #freespeech #wyoming
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1K Views
Sponsored

Tvorba webstránok na mieru

Vytvoríme vám profesionálnu webstánku

Tweetko https://tweetko.com