What is Iran’s ‘ace in the hole’ | FT #shorts In the latest episode of the Rachman Review podcast, the FT's Gideon Rachman speaks to Simon Gass, a former UK ambassador to Iran, about why the formidable destructive power of the US and Israel has failed to dislodge the Islamic regime. ⁠ #trump #usiran #usiranrelations #shortsvideo #shortfeed #shorts #shortsviral #shortsyoutube #shortsvideos ► Enjoying FT content? #What #Irans #ace #the #hole

How markets are responding to Trump's war with Iran | FT #shorts How are markets responding to the US and Israel's war with Iran now that Donald Trump has given conflicting messages on how long it will last?⁠ #markets #financialmarkets #trump #usiran #usiranrelations #shortsvideo #shortfeed #shorts #shortsviral #shortsyoutube #shortsvideos ► Enjoying FT content? #How #markets #are #responding #Trumps

The consequences of conflicts often ripple through nations for generations. With the recent tensions between the US and Iran, it's clear that both countries’ new leaders will have to grapple with the same issues that ignited hostilities in the first place. This isn’t just about military strategy; it’s a complex web of politics, culture, and history that demands thoughtful engagement. As we reflect on how this war began, it's crucial to consider how it can be de-escalated. A mere cessation of hostilities isn't enough; there needs to be a commitment to addressing the root causes of discord. What steps should leaders take to foster a lasting peace? Collaboration, understanding, and diplomacy might just hold the key. How do you think these nations can move forward? https://www.ft.com/content/0321036f-6fd0-415f-b016-12958cc8b04b #USIranRelations #GlobalPolitics #ConflictResolution #PeaceInitiatives

The loss of approximately $2 billion worth of military equipment by the U.S. during the first four days of attacks on Iran is a staggering figure that raises serious questions about the costs of warfare. This situation not only highlights the financial implications of military engagement but also the human and political consequences that follow such actions. As nations strategize their military operations, it's crucial to consider not just the immediate objectives but also the long-term impacts on regional stability and international relations. The significant loss of equipment could indicate a larger strategy at play or potential miscalculations in the execution of military tactics. Additionally, this raises concerns about the effectiveness of military investments when high-value assets can be lost in such a short time frame. What do you think this means for the future of U.S.-Iran relations? Is there a lesson to be learned here about the economics of warfare? https://www.gundemkibris.com/abd-irana-saldirilarin-4-gununde-yaklasik-2-milyar-dolarlik-askeri-ekipman-kaybetti #MilitaryStrategy #USIranRelations #WarfareCosts #GlobalPolitics

The recent U.S. strikes on Iran have raised serious questions about international law. French President Emmanuel Macron, together with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, has openly challenged the legality of these military actions, highlighting the importance of adhering to global norms and agreements. It's crucial to remember that military interventions often come with complex legal implications. When a nation acts without support from international bodies like the United Nations, it can create a dangerous precedent that undermines international stability. The discourse around these strikes emphasizes the need for accountability and dialogue in global politics. How do you view these strikes? Do you think they were justified or a violation of international law? Let's discuss! https://www.politico.eu/article/us-strikes-on-iran-outside-international-law/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&utm_medium=RSS&utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication #InternationalLaw #USIranRelations #GlobalPolitics #Macron

US and Israeli strikes on Iran will decide the fate of Trump's presidency | FT #shorts In launching an attack against Iran and calling for a regime change, Donald Trump has made the most fateful decision of his presidency, and arguably the most fateful decision of any US president since George W Bush launched the invasion of Iraq in 2003, says FT foreign editor Alec Russell.⁠ #trump #iran #israel #usiran #usiranrelations #shortsvideo #shortfeed #shorts #shortsviral #shortsyoutube #shortsvideos ► Enjoying FT content? #and #Israeli #strikes #Iran #will

Did you hear? It looks like diplomacy is taking a backseat while the U.S. is revving up for an all-or-nothing showdown with Iran. Just thirty-six hours after some supposedly productive talks in Geneva, it seems like the diplomatic niceties have gone right out the window. Who needs to solve things peacefully when you can just unleash the chaos, right? I mean, nothing says "serious negotiations" like planning a full-scale attack! Seriously, are we really that addicted to drama? It’s like a bad reality TV show where every episode ends in a cliffhanger. What’s next—an Iranian version of "Survivor"? If this keeps up, I'm going to need a new popcorn supply just to keep up with the news. What do you all think? Ready for the next wild twist in this saga? https://news.sky.com/story/trump-is-going-for-regime-change-despite-positive-talks-with-iran-13513259 #DiplomacyOrWar #AllOrNothing #DramaAlert #USIranRelations

Is there a tighter rope to walk than the one between war and peace? The escalating tensions between the US and Iran illustrate just how precarious our world can be. With military posturing and heated words flying, the challenge looms: can diplomacy rise above the din of drums of war? It's clear that both sides have much to lose, and the path to a deal may be fraught, requiring a delicate balance where egos and national pride must take a backseat. The real question is, are these nations ready to seize the moment for dialogue, or will they let fear and pride dictate the terms of their future? Let's hope they find the courage to negotiate instead of escalate. What do you think it will take for both sides to come to the table? https://www.ft.com/content/7b6e8aa1-45aa-4304-a58f-34368801c8d0 #USIranRelations #Peace #Diplomacy #ConflictResolution

Is peace really on the horizon or just a political game? The recent discussions between the US and Iran in Oman raise a lot of questions about the sincerity of both sides. Trump's assertion that "Iran wants to make a deal" seems optimistic, but could it be more of a strategy to ease pressure rather than a genuine pathway to resolution? With the looming threat of additional tariffs on countries trading with Iran, it feels like a high-stakes poker game where both parties must weigh their next moves carefully. Are we truly moving towards a deal, or are we simply waiting for the next confrontation? What do you think—can real negotiations lead to lasting peace? https://www.gundemkibris.com/anlasma-yapmak-istiyorlar-cok-vaktimiz-var #USIranRelations #Diplomacy #PoliticalGame #PeaceNegotiations

Can the world really afford a nuclear standoff? The upcoming nuclear talks between the US and Iran in Oman set the stage for pivotal negotiations that could either ease tensions or escalate them dramatically. With Donald Trump considering military options, this moment feels critical. It’s a high-stakes game where the implications are profound, not just for the Middle East but for global security as a whole. The fact that discussions are happening is a glimmer of hope amidst uncertainty, but can diplomacy prevail over the threats of military action? It makes one wonder whether we're truly prepared for the consequences of failure. What do you think? Will these talks pave the way for peace or lead us down a darker path? https://www.ft.com/content/5edc63d6-8870-426e-9397-0d64d288aca4 #USIranRelations #NuclearTalks #GlobalSecurity #Diplomacy

The recent shifts in U.S.-Iran relations are raising eyebrows across the Middle East. It seems that Arab governments are breathing a sigh of relief, believing that the tensions between the U.S. and Iran have been “de-escalated.” However, the constant movements of U.S. military personnel and their aircraft carriers in the region keep everyone on edge. This situation is reminiscent of a high-stakes chess game, where every piece moved can change the entire board. While the perception of reduced tension is a positive signal, the underlying realities remain complex. The military presence might provide a sense of security for some, but for others, it can be a source of anxiety, fearing that any miscalculation could lead to unintended consequences. What do you think this means for the future of U.S.-Middle East relations? Are we witnessing an actual shift or just a temporary lull in hostilities? https://www.ft.com/content/df0c0833-59f6-45d6-a74f-008b46756e72 #MiddleEast #USIranRelations #Diplomacy #GlobalNews

The tension in Iran is reaching a boiling point, with the U.S. President warning of potential military intervention. This situation raises serious questions about the balance of power and the human cost of these protests. How far will the international community go to support those crying out for change? https://wyborcza.pl/7,75399,32518662,nie-bedzie-poblazliwosci-iran-odciety-od-swiata-dziesiatki.html #IranProtests #USIranRelations #HumanRights